What Has Changed in European Concept of Undertaking? From „FENIN“ to „EASY PAY“
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54869/syeul.2021.1.241Keywords:
competition, undertaking, economic activity, public procurementAbstract
Competition is the main self-regulatory principle of the market in general, internal market included. Competition law has the form of general clauses making its application dependant on the correct interpretation of general concepts. Core competition rules of the Functional Treaty („TFEU“) are addressed to undertakings; undertaking thus belongs to key concepts of competition law. Interpretation of this concept is decisive for the scope of competition rules application. So, the article explores different approaches of the case law to the interpretation of the concept of undertaking based on economic activity. It compares the FENIN doctrine and the new functional test of separability developed in EASY PAY. It drives attention to the impact of this new test for the evaluation of procurement activities under competition scrutiny.
References
Blažo, O. (2014). Twenty Years of Harmonisation and Still Divergent: Development of Slovak Competition Law. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 7(9), pp. 109-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2738387
Kalesná, K. (2019). Kto sa môže zúčastniť verejného obstarávania? Právny obzor, 102(3), pp. 224-233.
Lapšanský, L. (2018). Peripetie eurokonformného výkladu ustanovení o osobnej pôsobnosti zákona o ochrane hospodárskej súťaže na činnosť verejného zdravotného poistenia. Právny obzor, 101(6), pp. 566-582.
Patakyová, M. (2020). Vykonávajú zdravotné poisťovne hospodársku činnosť? Acta Facultatis Iuridicae Universitatis Comenianae, 39(2), pp. 261-274.
Sánchez Graells, A. and Herrera Anchustegui, I. (2015). Revisiting the concept of undertaking from a public procurement law perspective – A discussion on EasyPay and Finance Engineering. SSRN Papers, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2695742 (accessed on 18.09.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2695742
Prieto, S. (2020). EEA/EU Public Procurement: Administrative Acts in breach of competition law by contracting authorities. What can FENIN still teach us? EEA/EU & Competition Law: a personal approach, available at: https://sonsolesprieto.wordpress.com/2020/11/11/eea-eu-public-procurement-administrative-acts-in-breach-of-competition-rules-by-contracting-authorities-what-can-fenin-still-teach-us/ (accessed on 18.09.2021).
Steiner, J. and Woods, L. (2009). EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780199219070.
CJEU, judgment of 23 April 1991, Klaus Höfner and Fritz Elser v Macrotron GmbH., C-41/90, ECLI:EU:C:1991:161.
CJEU, judgment of 26 March 2009, SELEX Sistemi Integrati SpA v Commission, C-113/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:191.
CJEU, judgment of 12 July 2012, Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich, C-138/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:449.
CJEU, judgment of 22 October 2015, "EasyPay" AD and "Finance Engineering" AD v Ministerski savet na Republika Bulgaria and Natsionalen osiguritelen institut, C-185/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:716.
Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0024 (accessed on 18.09.2021).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Slovak Yearbook of European Union Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Author(s) transfers copyright to the Article to the Publisher of the Journal by the Licence Agreement.
The Author(s) retains rights specified in the Licence Agreement.
The readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all of the Article of the Journal and use them for any other lawful purpose under specified Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC).
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
Grant numbers APVV-17-064