The Development of the German Immigration Policy after 2015

a Balancing Act between Populism and EU Policy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54869/syeul.2021.1.242

Keywords:

Migration, populism, immigration policy, EU policy, Germany

Abstract

Germany is seen and presented by itself as a welcome country. It is a country of immigration. First, there was the “Gastarbeiter” period when within agreements made by Germany and southern European states several thousand worker arrived in Germany and most of them made the country their permanent home. The country experienced another migration wave when the former Central-European countries became members of the European Union. In 2015, similar to other European States, Germany too experienced a migration-shock which resulted in a political-social turmoil in the German society. Not only politicians, but average people faced the same never-seen-before challenge on different levels, due to the number of migrants arriving in short term onto the territory of the state: one in the everyday life of its community, one in the political and legal perspective. Irrespectively of their reactions or adaptation methods, one common point of these actors was that they had to come to terms with the fact that a huge number of irregular migrants will stay long-term in Germany. However, the wave challenged the “welcome” country attitude both at political and at societal level. The author argues that roles, namely, the country affected by the migration wave, and the country being a leading European Union Member State became contradicted because of the measures introduced after 2015. This is underlined by the normative analysis of the main measures in this article, but because migration policy overlaps other policy areas, for example integration policy, interior policy, these measures touch upon different issues.

Author Biography

Réka Friedery, Centre for Social Sciences

Réka Friedery
Research Fellow
Institute for Legal Studies,
Centre of Social Sciences, Centre of Excellence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Tóth Kálmán street 4
H-1097 Budapest
Hungary

References

Aiginger, K. (2020). Populism: Root Causes, Power Grabbing and Counter Strategy. Intereconomics, 55(1), pp. 38–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0867-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0867-3

Bade, K. (2014). Willkommenskultur und Fremdenangst in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. Deutsch Türkische Nachrichten.

Bade, K. J. (2000). Migration und Integration in Deutschland seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg Probleme – Erfolge – Perspektiven. Hahn Druckerei.

Bathke, B. (2019). German policy package on migration: What will change for asylum seekers and migrants? Info Migrants. Available at: https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/17379/german-policy-package-on-migration-what-will-change-for-asylum-seekers-and-migrants (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

Bick, A. (2018). Right to Family Reunification in German. In R. Friedery, L. Manca, and R. Rosskopf (Eds.), Family Reunification International, European and National Perspectives (1st ed., pp. 95–118). BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.

Braun, K. H. (2021). 60 Jahre Anwerbeabkommen mit der Türkei 30. Oktober 1961: Ein Notenwechsel, der Deutschland verändert hat. Landeszentrale Für Politische Bildung BW. Available at: https://www.lpb-bw.de/anwerbeabkommen-tuerkei#c77702 (accessed on 22.12. 2021).

Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat (BMI) (2016). 890.000 Asylsuchende im Jahr 2015. Avaliable at: https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/pressemitteilungen/DE/2016/09/asylsuchende-2015.html - this source is not used in the body of the article (accesssed on: 22.12.2021)

Butterwegge, C. (2005). Von der “Gastarbeiter”-Anwerbung zum Zuwanderungsgesetz. Bundeszentrale Für Politische Bildung. Avaliable at: https://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/migration/dossier-migration-ALT/56377/migrationspolitik-in-der-brd?p=all (accessed on: 22.12. 2021)

Die Bundesregierung (2016). Shorter procedures, less family reunification. Available at: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/kuerzere-verfahren-weniger-familiennachzug-370360#Start (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

Dimitriadi, A. (2016). The Janus face of Europe’s migration policy Contradictory approaches are built into the system of Europe’s migration and asylum policies. The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).

ECRE (2019a). Op-ed: Detention, Insecurity, Rights Deprivation – The Legal Crackdown on Asylum Seekers in Germany. European Council on Refugees and Exiles. Available at: https://ecre.org/detention-insecurity-rights-deprivation-the-legal-crackdown-on-asylum-seekers-in-germany/ (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

ECRE (2019b). German Parliament Passes “Orderly-Return-Law.” European Council on Refugees and Exiles. Available at: https://ecre.org/germany-parliament-passes-orderly-return-law/ (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

ECRE (2019c). Country Report: Germany. Available at: https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/report-download_aida_de_2019update.pdf (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community (2020). Asylum and refugee policy. Available at: https://www.bmi.bund.de/EN/topics/migration/asylum-refugee-protection/asylum-refugee-policy-germany/asylum-refugee-policy-node.html (accessed on: 22.12. 2021).

Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (2017). Migration, Integration, Asylum Political Developments in Germany 2016 Annual Policy Report by the German National Contact Point for the European Migration Network (EMN). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/homeaffairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/11a_germany_apr_part2_en.pdf (accessed on 22.12.2021).

Gesley, J. (2017). Germany : the development of migration and citizenship law in postwar Germany. The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Centre.

Glorius, B. (2018). Migration to Germany: Structures, processes, and discourses. Regional Statistics, 8(1), pp. 3–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15196/RS080101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15196/RS080101

Heckmann, F. (2014). Ein neuer Ton im migrationspolitischen Diskurs. In Vielfältiges Deutschland Bausteine für eine zukunftsfähige Gesellschaft. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.

Hruschka, C. (2019). The border spell: Dublin arrangements or bilateral agreements? Reflections on the cooperation between Germany and Greece / Spain in the context of control at the German-Austrian border. Droit et Politique de l’Immigration et de l’Asile de l’UE. Available at: https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/the-border-spell-dublin-arrangements-or-bilateral-agreements-reflections-on-the-cooperation-between-germany-and-greece-spain-in-the-context-of-control-at-the-german-austrian-border/ (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

Chin, R. (2007). The Guest Worker Question in Postwar Germany. Cambridge University Press.

International Organization for Migration (2020). WORLD MIGRATION REPORT 2020. Available at: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf (accessed on: 22.12.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30875/60123dd4-en

Knight, B. (2019). Germany passes refugee migration „stress test“: expert report. Deutsche Welle. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/germany-passes-refugee-migration-stress-test-expert-report/a-48639433 (accessed on 22,12. 2021).

Poularakis, S. (2018). The Case of the Administrative Arrangement between Greece and Germany: A tale of “paraDublin activity”? European Database of Asylum Law. Available at: https://www.asylumlawdatabase.eu/en/journal/case-administrative-arrangement-between-greece-and-germany-tale-“paradublin-activity” (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

Riedel, L. and Schneider, G. (2017). Dezentraler Asylvollzug diskriminiert: Anerkennungsquoten von Flüchtlingen im bundesdeutschen Vergleich, 2010-2015. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 58(1), pp. 23–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0032-3470-2017-1-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0032-3470-2017-1-23

Rodrik, D. (2019). Many forms of populism. VOX, CEPR Policy Portal. Available at: https://voxeu.org/article/many-forms-populism (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

Thym, D. (2018). Beyond the ‘Welcome Culture’: Projects of the New German Government on Migration, Asylum and Integration. Droit et Politique de l’Immigration et de l’Asile de l’UE. Available at: https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/beyond-the-welcome-culture-projects-of-the-new-german-government-on-migration-asylum-and-integration/ (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

Thym, D. (2019). The German Migration Package: A New Deal on Labour Migration? Droit et Politique de l’Immigration et de l’Asile de l’UE. Avaliable at: https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/the-german-migration-package-a-new-deal-on-labour-migration/ (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

Triadafilopoulos, T. (2019). Germany’s Post-2015 Immigration Dilemmas. Current History, 118(806), pp. 108–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2019.118.806.108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2019.118.806.108

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2016). International Migration Report 2015 Highlights. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2015_Highlights.pdf (accessed on: 22.12.2021).

US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2020). The World Factbook, Available at: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/germany/#people-and-society (accessed on: 22.12. 2021).

Directive 2013/32/EU Of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast).

Germany, Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany.

Germany, BGB1 2016 Part 1 no.12 p. 390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/whe-2016-c001

Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2021

How to Cite

Friedery, R. (2021). The Development of the German Immigration Policy after 2015: a Balancing Act between Populism and EU Policy. Slovak Yearbook of European Union Law, 1. https://doi.org/10.54869/syeul.2021.1.242

Issue

Section

Articles

Funding data